Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Tom took silk in March 2023. He has a broad practice across Chambers’ core areas of work. He is an experienced trial and appellate advocate, having argued cases before a wide range of courts and tribunals, including the Commercial Court, Competition Appeal Tribunal and Privy Council.
Tom is recognised in the latest editions of both the leading legal directories, Chambers UK and Legal 500, for his expertise in Administrative, Human Rights & Public, Employment, Media & Entertainment, Offshore, Sport and Telecommunications Law. Key recent comments include:
Tom was a member of the Attorney General's "A" Panel of Counsel until his appointment to silk in March 2023.
Tom has acted in several of the major commercial fraud cases of recent years. He also has experience of actions to recover the proceeds of crime, public inquiries into corruption, and constitutional and adminstrative law aspects of criminal defence work.
Defending an Attorney-at-Law in proceedings in Trinidad and Tobago involving allegations of fraud and conspiracy and a dispute about whether a freezing order was properly obtained.
Sole counsel for the claimants in a High Court claim for trade mark infringement and passing off.
Junior counsel for one of the Defendants to a $1.5 billion lawsuit alleging fraud, intimidation and bribery in connection with transactions entered into by Libya’s sovereign wealth fund under the Gaddafi regime.
Acted for the First Defendant in a claim brought by the Kuwaiti social security fund said by the Claimant to be worth in excess of US$850 million.
Tom, led by Robert Anderson QC, acted for the liquidators of Weavering Capital (UK) in a c. $500 million action against its former directors and in a subsequent appeal and proceedings for the taking of an account. The claims arose in connection with the collapse of the Weavering Hedge Fund and included claims in deceit / misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence.
Junior counsel for SOCA (now the National Crime Agency) in an action for the civil recovery of c. $6 million constituting the proceeds of crime and in a subsequent appeal to the court of Appeal.
Junior counsel for the liquidators of Bernard Madoff’s former London company in the six-week Commercial Court trial of the company’s claim for breach of directors’ duty, dishonest assistance, knowing receipt, restitution and recovery of trust property. Tom has also been involved in various other pieces of litigation to recover the US$50 billion lost under Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, in a retainer involving multi-jurisdictional disputes covering issues of EU law, cross-border insolvency, US bankruptcy law, tracing claims and trusts law. The issues in the case included shareholder ratification and the application of the ex turpi causa doctrine in the context of claims by companies.
Tom acts for individuals, companies and governments in civil liberties and human rights cases, including judicial review claims, applications to Strasbourg and private law actions against the police, Home Office and other public authorities. Tom’s practice in this area has included appearances before the European Court of Human Rights, Privy Council, Court of Appeal and Administrative Court. For his specific experience of damages claims against the State, please see under that heading below.
“Tom's ability to identify all the pertinent issues in each case, and relay the same to judges in a digestible manner, is remarkable. He is a calming presence in court.”
Legal 500, 2025
“Tom is an outstanding barrister. Intelligent, incredibly knowledgeable and extremely good with clients. He is a real pleasure to work with.”
Legal 500, 2023
Acted for the Secretary of State in a judicial review and Article 5 claim concerning the recall to prison of prisoners released on licence.
Junior counsel for the appellant, led by Lord Pannick QC, in a shipping case giving rise to important issues of appellate restraint and the proper approach to evidence alleged to have been obtained by torture.
Junior counsel for the claimants in a leading A1P1 damages claim concerning the Government’s changes to the Solar Feed In Tariff subsidy scheme.
Sole counsel for the Secretary of State in this immigration appeal concerning the construction and application of section 85 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
Acted for the Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago in a Privy Council appeal concerning the retrospective removal by Act of Parliament of a limitation period for criminal offences, which was said by the Appellants to involve a violation of the principle of separation of powers and to infringe their constitutional rights.
Acted for Mr Bevan (a claimant) in appeals concerning the sanctioning of jobseekers allowance claimants under “back to work” schemes – as sole counsel before the Upper Tribunal and then with a leader in the Court of Appeal. Issues in the case included whether the retrospective validation of the sanctioning scheme is contrary to the ECHR, and the requirements of common law fairness in the context of the schemes.
Acted for the Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago in an appeal concerning a damages claim for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution.
Tom is a commercial litigator experienced in working both as sole counsel and as a member of a large legal team. For his specific experience of civil fraud, media and entertainment, sport and telecommunications work please see the relevant headings above and below.
“He has excellent judgement in terms of knowing how things will play out in court.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Tom is a quietly effective advocate who holds his own against very experienced silks.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“He is very supportive of clients and solicitors and gives outstanding advice.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
Newcastle United brought arbitral proceedings against the Premier League in connection with the proposed takeover over of the club by the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund. Tom (led by Shaheed Fatima QC and Nick De Marco QC) acted for the club in a Commercial Court claim seeking the removal, on grounds of apparent bias, of the chairman of the arbitrators.
Acting for the SFO in a $250 million claim for inducing breach of contract and misfeasance in public office.
Acted for the First Defendant in a claim brought by the Kuwaiti social security fund said by the Claimant to be worth in excess of US$850 million.
Junior counsel for Telefónica, the operator of the O2 network, resisting an appeal by Ofcom against an order for restitution of very substantial licence fees.
Junior counsel for the appellant, led by Lord Pannick QC, in a shipping case giving rise to important issues of appellate restraint and the proper approach to evidence alleged to have been obtained by torture.
Acted for the Defendants in a dispute concerning the operation of the Trinidad and Tobago T20 cricket team.
Junior counsel for one of the Defendants to a $1.5 billion lawsuit alleging fraud, intimidation and bribery in connection with transactions entered into by Libya’s sovereign wealth fund under the Gaddafi regime.
Acted for the claimant in a contractual dispute forming part of complex litigation concerning control of multi-billion euro real property in Spain.
Junior counsel for Saatchi Online, an online art company, in litigation brought against it by one of its former shareholders, Charles Saatchi, in connection with the alleged termination of an intellectual property licence to use the “Saatchi” name. The case settled after the hearing of Saatchi Online’s summary judgment application.
Junior counsel for SOCA (now the National Crime Agency) in an action for the civil recovery of c. $6 million constituting the proceeds of crime and in a subsequent appeal to the court of Appeal.
Junior counsel for a respondent to a claim involving allegations of conspiracy and breach of Article 101 TFEU.
Junior counsel for the liquidators of Bernard Madoff’s former London company in the six-week Commercial Court trial of the company’s claim for breach of directors’ duty, dishonest assistance, knowing receipt, restitution and recovery of trust property. Tom has also been involved in various other pieces of litigation to recover the US$50 billion lost under Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, in a retainer involving multi-jurisdictional disputes covering issues of EU law, cross-border insolvency, US bankruptcy law, tracing claims and trusts law. The issues in the case included shareholder ratification and the application of the ex turpi causa doctrine in the context of claims by companies.
Tom, led by Robert Anderson QC, acted for the liquidators of Weavering Capital (UK) in a c. $500 million action against its former directors and in a subsequent appeal and proceedings for the taking of an account. The claims arose in connection with the collapse of the Weavering Hedge Fund and included claims in deceit / misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence.
Sole counsel for the Claimant in a six-day Commercial Court trial concerning a claim for fees and costs in connection with the failure of the reverse takeover of an AIM-listed public limited company. The issues included the applicability to the Claimant’s claim of the statutory prohibition on financial assistance.
Tom’s practice across commercial, human rights, EU and public law has seen him acting for or advising both claimants and defendants in a wide range of damages claims against governments and public authorities, including under section 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998, on Francovich principles, and in private law (e.g. in contract, misfeasance in public office, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and breach of fiduciary duty).
Tom’s employment practice has a focus on claims raising issues of EU law, but he accepts instructions for both claimants and respondents in all areas of employment law. Tom co-wrote the age discrimination chapter in Tolley’s Discrimination in Employment Handbook and was a member of the CBI’s working party on holiday pay.
“Tom is a strategic thinker, and his calm yet direct advocacy style is very effective.”
Legal 500, 2025
“A real team player who is accessible and practical in his outlook.”
Legal 500, 2022
“Great for detail with impressive communication skills.”
Legal 500, 2021
“On top of the detail, considered and a clear communicator.”
Legal 500, 2019
“A genuine rising star with a mega-brain.”
Legal 500, 2015
“He is highly intelligent and his speed of thought is incredible”
Legal 500, 2016
“A real team player who is accessible and practical in his outlook”
Legal 500, 2022
Sole counsel for the respondents in various sets of multi-claimant Employment Tribunal proceedings for alleged underpayment of holiday pay.
Acted for the appellant in a case concerning promotions in the Police Service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Acted for the Respondent in a multi-claimant claim for underpayment of EU holiday pay.
Acted for the Respondent (the state broadcasting company of Trinidad and Tobago) resisting an application for permission to appeal to the Privy Council by the Respondent’s former chief executive officer in an employment dispute arising from the termination of her employment contract following a new government coming to power in Trinidad and Tobago in 2010.
Led by Dinah Rose QC, Tom Richards acted for Amec in this leading case on holiday pay, arguing questions of EU and domestic statutory interpretation before the EAT.
Tom has appeared in EU law cases from the Employment Tribunals to the CJEU. For Tom’s specific EU law experience in the sectors of employment, intellectual property, sport and telecommunications please see above and below under the relevant headings.
“On top of the detail, a considered and a clear communicator.”
Legal 500, 2019
Led by Dinah Rose QC, Tom Richards acted for Amec in this leading case on holiday pay, arguing questions of EU and domestic statutory interpretation before the EAT.
Acted for the Secretary of State in an Upper Tribunal appeal concerning the effect of the CJEU’s judgment in C-537/09 Bartlett & Ors.
Junior counsel for the intervener, the Incorporated Society of Musicians, supporting the Claimants’ successful challenge to regulations exempting private copying from the scope of copyright protection. The case involved questions of the intensity of review in an EU proportionality context, the harmonised EU copyright regime and State aid law.
Junior counsel for the Claimant in judicial review proceedings involving the effect of the Medical Devices Directive.
Acted for Telefónica in a challenge to Ofcom’s decision on Annual Licence Fees.
Junior counsel for Leyton Orient in an EU and domestic law challenge to the procurement process for the award to West Ham of a concession to use Olympic Stadium. Tom also acted in an earlier judicial review challenge concerning the Stadium award in 2011 and in related arbitration proceedings under FA Rule K.
Acted for members of the criminal Bar in their challenge to the legality of the Legal Services Board’s adoption of the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates. The Supreme Court’s decision is considered a key judgment on intensity of judicial review in an EU law proportionality context.
Appeared as sole counsel for Telefónica in a CAT appeal against a determination by Ofcom concerning “flip-flopping” of termination rates by H3G and Vodafone.
Acted for the Respondent in a multi-claimant claim for underpayment of EU holiday pay.
Competition law features in a wide range of contexts across Tom’s practice, including the cases included below.
“On top of the detail, a considered and a clear communicator.”
Legal 500, 2019
Junior counsel for the AFA in a complaint to the European Commission challenging FIFA’s proposed new regulations for football agents on EU competition law grounds.
Advising a sports governing body on the implications of competition law for proposed negotiations relating to the collective selling of media rights.
Junior counsel for London Welsh in its appeal against its non-promotion to the Premiership, establishing that the rules which had been applied to prevent the club’s promotion were void for breach of competition law.
Junior counsel for a respondent to a claim involving allegations of conspiracy and breach of Article 101 TFEU.
Tom’s intellectual property practice has its focus on soft IP. He has experience of copyright (including issues of Crown copyright, digital royalties and streaming, film rights, literary adaptation, online infringement and music royalties), design right, passing off, trademarks and confidential information; and he is particularly interested in the nexus between intellectual property and EU law (a subject on which he has lectured and has been interviewed by the BBC).
Acted for Domino in a claim by the recording artist known as "Four Tet" seeking increased digital royalties and the assignment to him of Domino's masters.
Sole counsel for the claimants in a High Court claim for trade mark infringement and passing off.
Sole counsel for the claimants in the November 2020 retrial of the leading modern case on joint authorship.
Acted for the defendants in a trade mark infringement claim involving alleged “grey market” goods.
Junior counsel for for the defendant record company in a claim for alleged underpayment of digital royalties brought by members of the band Radiohead.
Junior counsel for the defendant record company in a claim for alleged underpayment of digital royalties brought by members of the band Marillion.
Junior counsel for the intervener, the Incorporated Society of Musicians, supporting the Claimants’ successful challenge to regulations exempting private copying from the scope of copyright protection. The case involved questions of the intensity of review in an EU proportionality context, the harmonised EU copyright regime and State aid law.
Junior counsel for Saatchi Online, an online art company, in litigation brought against it by one of its former shareholders, Charles Saatchi, in connection with the alleged termination of an intellectual property licence to use the “Saatchi” name. The case settled after the hearing of Saatchi Online’s summary judgment application.
Junior counsel for the claimants in a series of actions by the record industry under s. 97A CDPA 1998, requiring ISPs to block access to The Pirate Bay and other websites used for online copyright infringement.
Tom is ranked as a media and entertainment law silk by Legal 500.
“Tom is a go-to instruction for complex contractual matters requiring forensic analysis and an understanding of the media and entertainment industry.”
Legal 500, 2025
“His experience of working with economic experts and his input on expert evidence is invaluable. He is a strategic thinker, responsive and flexible.”
Legal 500, 2024
“Fantastic on his feet and very effective in cross-examination.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Tom is an expert in the music litigation area. A bright and hard-working junior who can be counted on to do an excellent job.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Tom is excellent on his feet. His cross-examination is calm, focussed and very effective. He is very responsive, gives practical and strategic advice and is able to explain things clearly to the client.”
Legal 500, 2023
“He is an exceptional cross-examiner, on top of the law and a commercially-minded barrister.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“He's unfailingly enthusiastic and very good to work with.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“An incredible advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“He has a reassuring presence with clients and is an incredible advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“He's excellent - extremely bright and very concise.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“Seamlessly integrates into any team, excellent written work and advocacy.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He is a very bright and user-friendly barrister.”
Legal 500, 2019
“His maturity in approaching the case and his analysis were at the high level you'd expect from a Blackstone barrister.”
Chambers UK, 2016
“A very impressive, highly responsive junior with excellent attention to detail.”
Legal 500, 2015
“an exceptional cross-examiner, on top of the law and a commercially-minded barrister”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
Sole counsel for the claimants in the November 2020 retrial of the leading modern case on joint authorship.
Acted for Domino in a claim by the recording artist known as "Four Tet" seeking increased digital royalties and the assignment to him of Domino's masters.
Junior counsel for for the defendant record company in a claim for alleged underpayment of digital royalties brought by members of the band Radiohead.
Junior counsel for the defendant record company in a claim for alleged underpayment of digital royalties brought by members of the band Marillion.
Junior counsel for Saatchi Online, an online art company, in litigation brought against it by one of its former shareholders, Charles Saatchi, in connection with the alleged termination of an intellectual property licence to use the “Saatchi” name. The case settled after the hearing of Saatchi Online’s summary judgment application.
Junior counsel for the claimants in a series of actions by the record industry under s. 97A CDPA 1998, requiring ISPs to block access to The Pirate Bay and other websites used for online copyright infringement.
Junior counsel for the Defendant firm of literary agents in a claim concerning a 60-year old assignment of copyright and a BBC production of John Braine’s classic novel Room at the Top. The matter settled shortly before trial.
Acted with Tom Coates for the Claimant at the trial of its claim for infringement of its music publishing rights in the Spandau Ballet hits "Gold" and "True".
Tom has a particular interest in the constitutional law of the Anglophone Caribbean but his practice includes commercial as well as public law work. He has appeared before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in more than 10 appeals, in several of which he has had conduct of the advocacy.
In April 2016 Tom was called as a permanent member of the Bar of Trinidad & Tobago.
Counsel for the appellants, a Venezuelan mother and child, in an appeal involving the legality of their detention by the immigration authorities of Trinidad and Tobago.
Acted for the appellant in an appeal from Trinidad and Tobago involving the remedies available for the wrongful detention of chattels.
Acted for the appellant in a Privy Council appeal concerning the constitutional right to equality of treatment.
Acted for the appellant in a case concerning promotions in the Police Service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Acted for the Appellant in a case concerning among other things the jurisdiction of the Court of the Sensechal of Sark and the quality of law requirement of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Acted as sole counsel for the State of Trinidad and Tobago resisting an appeal in a malicious prosecution claim.
Acted for Delta Petroleum in a Privy Council appeal and cross-appeal concerning the lawfulness of a seizure of fuel by the BVI Customs Commissioner and a claim by Delta for damages.
Acted for the State of Trinidad and Tobago in a public law appeal concerning the jurisdiction of a commission established to award compensation to police officers and other members of the protective services injured in the line of duty.
Acted for the appellant in a Privy Council appeal concerning the assessment of compensatory damages for the State’s failure to award a radio licence.
Acted for the Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago in a Privy Council appeal concerning the retrospective removal by Act of Parliament of a limitation period for criminal offences, which was said by the Appellants to involve a violation of the principle of separation of powers and to infringe their constitutional rights.
Acted for the Respondent (the state broadcasting company of Trinidad and Tobago) resisting an application for permission to appeal to the Privy Council by the Respondent’s former chief executive officer in an employment dispute arising from the termination of her employment contract following a new government coming to power in Trinidad and Tobago in 2010.
Acted for the Appellant in a public law appeal before the Privy Council concerning promotions in the police and public service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Acted for the State of Trinidad and Tobago in an appeal concerning alleged unconstitutional discrimination against members of the Special Reserve Police force.
Acted for the Appellant in a public law appeal before the Privy Council concerning promotions in the police and public service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Acted for the Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago in an appeal concerning a damages claim for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution.
Acted for the State of Trinidad and Tobago before the Privy Council in an urgent bias challenge to a High Court Judge of Trinidad and Tobago hearing a constitutional claim against the State in relation to a politically and environmentally controversial highway extension project.
Appeared before the Privy Council as an advocate for the Appellant in an appeal concerning promotions in the Prison Service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Junior counsel for the appellant in a constitutional appeal concerning the composition of the Judicial and Legal Services Commission of Trinidad and Tobago.
Tom is recommended as a public law silk by both the leading directories and has appeared as an advocate in public and regulatory law cases in the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Court, Competition Appeal Tribunal, Court of Appeal and Privy Council. His clients include individuals (particularly in the fields of asylum and social security), corporations, governments and other public bodies.
“He is a superb junior; very effective.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“He's extremely able, hard-working and a strong advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“An outstanding practitioner.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“Exceptionally able, hard working, and persuasive with excellent judgement.”
Legal 500, 2022
“A dedicated lawyer whose persistence is bound to yield dividends.”
Legal 500, 2021
“Extremely intellectual, but unusually combined with an excellent client manner.”
Legal 500, 2019
“He is incredibly intelligent, really strong on judicial review and his written work and organisational skills are fantastic.”
Chambers UK, 2016
“Amazingly talented and a pleasure to work with.”
Legal 500, 2016
“Very good drafting and legal analysis”
Chambers UK, 2017
“An outstanding practitioner”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“The quality of his output is outstanding”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“Exceptionally able, hard working, and persuasive with excellent judgement”
Legal 500, 2022
Acted for the Secretary of State in a judicial review and Article 5 claim concerning the recall to prison of prisoners released on licence.
Acting for the SFO in a $250 million claim for inducing breach of contract and misfeasance in public office.
Junior counsel for HMRC in a significant Court of Appeal decision on HMRC's powers of informal investigation.
Junior counsel for Telefónica, the operator of the O2 network, resisting an appeal by Ofcom against an order for restitution of very substantial licence fees.
Acted for the appellant in a Privy Council appeal concerning the constitutional right to equality of treatment.
Acted for the appellant in a case concerning promotions in the Police Service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Acted for the Independent Press Standards Organisation resisting the first claim for judicial review of one of its decisions.
Acted for Delta Petroleum in a Privy Council appeal and cross-appeal concerning the lawfulness of a seizure of fuel by the BVI Customs Commissioner and a claim by Delta for damages.
Acted for the appellant in a Privy Council appeal concerning the assessment of compensatory damages for the State’s failure to award a radio licence.
Junior counsel for the claimants in a leading A1P1 damages claim concerning the Government’s changes to the Solar Feed In Tariff subsidy scheme.
Acted for Telefónica in a challenge to Ofcom’s decision on Annual Licence Fees.
Acted for Mr Bevan (a claimant) in appeals concerning the sanctioning of jobseekers allowance claimants under “back to work” schemes – as sole counsel before the Upper Tribunal and then with a leader in the Court of Appeal. Issues in the case included whether the retrospective validation of the sanctioning scheme is contrary to the ECHR, and the requirements of common law fairness in the context of the schemes.
Junior counsel for the Claimant in judicial review proceedings involving the effect of the Medical Devices Directive.
Sole counsel for the Secretary of State in this immigration appeal concerning the construction and application of section 85 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
Acted for HMRC resisting a renewed application for permission to claim judicial review of HMRC’s refusal to give a refund in respect of levies made under the UK/Swiss Agreement on tax co-operation.
Acted for the Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago in a Privy Council appeal concerning the retrospective removal by Act of Parliament of a limitation period for criminal offences, which was said by the Appellants to involve a violation of the principle of separation of powers and to infringe their constitutional rights.
Acted for members of the criminal Bar in their challenge to the legality of the Legal Services Board’s adoption of the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates. The Supreme Court’s decision is considered a key judgment on intensity of judicial review in an EU law proportionality context.
Junior counsel for the intervener, the Incorporated Society of Musicians, supporting the Claimants’ successful challenge to regulations exempting private copying from the scope of copyright protection. The case involved questions of the intensity of review in an EU proportionality context, the harmonised EU copyright regime and State aid law.
Acted for the State of Trinidad and Tobago in a public law appeal concerning the jurisdiction of a commission established to award compensation to police officers and other members of the protective services injured in the line of duty.
Acted for the State of Trinidad and Tobago in an appeal concerning alleged unconstitutional discrimination against members of the Special Reserve Police force.
Acted for the Appellant in a public law appeal before the Privy Council concerning promotions in the police and public service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Acted for the Appellant in a public law appeal before the Privy Council concerning promotions in the police and public service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Acted for the State of Trinidad and Tobago before the Privy Council in an urgent bias challenge to a High Court Judge of Trinidad and Tobago hearing a constitutional claim against the State in relation to a politically and environmentally controversial highway extension project.
Junior counsel for Leyton Orient in an EU and domestic law challenge to the procurement process for the award to West Ham of a concession to use Olympic Stadium. Tom also acted in an earlier judicial review challenge concerning the Stadium award in 2011 and in related arbitration proceedings under FA Rule K.
Acted for Playboy in regulatory proceedings brought by Ofcom as co-regulator of On Demand Programme Services.
Appeared as sole counsel for Telefónica in a CAT appeal against a determination by Ofcom concerning “flip-flopping” of termination rates by H3G and Vodafone.
Appeared before the Privy Council as an advocate for the Appellant in an appeal concerning promotions in the Prison Service of Trinidad and Tobago.
Junior counsel for the appellant in a constitutional appeal concerning the composition of the Judicial and Legal Services Commission of Trinidad and Tobago.
Tom is recommended as a sports law silk by both leading directories. He has experience of a variety of sport-related disputes, including in relation to competition law, doping issues, appeals over penalty, broadcasting rights, players’ agents and player transfers; and his clients have included sports associations (e.g. The Football Association, The Football League, the Rugby Football League, the Welsh Rugby Union, UK Athletics), clubs and corporations (e.g. Cardiff City FC, London Welsh RFC, Leyton Orient FC, Matchroom Sport Ltd) and individuals (e.g. Joe Calzaghe, Barry Hearn).
Tom is an author of the competition law chapter in Lewis and Taylor’s Sport: Law and Practice and of the Financial Fair Play chapter in De Marco's Football and the Law.
“Tom Richards KC is phenomenally clever and technically excellent.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“He is incredibly bright.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“A very strong junior for sports regulatory matters and particularly strong on competition law.”
Legal 500, 2022
“He is extremely personable and has a genuine talent for interacting with clients.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“Excellent in-depth knowledge of the application of competition law in sport.”
Legal 500, 2021
“On top of the detail, a considered and a clear communicator.”
Legal 500, 2019
“He is incredibly bright, a creative thinker and an exceptional advocate.”
Legal 500, 2015
“Excellent in his written submissions, and willing to challenge more senior counterparts during advocacy”
Legal 500, 2016
“Incredibly bright, personable, hard-working and the first choice for complex legal disputes in sport”
Chambers UK, 2017
“An extremely capable and personable advocate.”
Chambers UK, 2018
“A very strong junior for sports regulatory matters and particularly strong on competition law”
Legal 500, 2022
Newcastle United brought arbitral proceedings against the Premier League in connection with the proposed takeover over of the club by the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund. Tom (led by Shaheed Fatima QC and Nick De Marco QC) acted for the club in a Commercial Court claim seeking the removal, on grounds of apparent bias, of the chairman of the arbitrators.
Advising a sports governing body on the implications of competition law for proposed negotiations relating to the collective selling of media rights.
Acted for Derby County in disciplinary proceedings relating to the Championship Profitability & Sustainability Rules.
Junior counsel for the AFA in a complaint to the European Commission challenging FIFA’s proposed new regulations for football agents on EU competition law grounds.
Junior counsel for Leyton Orient in an EU and domestic law challenge to the procurement process for the award to West Ham of a concession to use Olympic Stadium. Tom also acted in an earlier judicial review challenge concerning the Stadium award in 2011 and in related arbitration proceedings under FA Rule K.
Acted for Eddie and Barry Hearn and Matchroom Sport Ltd in a claim by Frank Warren and his promotions vehicle concerning alleged poaching of a boxer.
Junior counsel for London Welsh in its appeal against its non-promotion to the Premiership, establishing that the rules which had been applied to prevent the club’s promotion were void for breach of competition law.
Tom is ranked in the telecommunications sector by both leading directories. He has advised on, or acted in, challenges to decisions of ATVOD, the BBC, the Communications Authority of Hong Kong, HM Government, Ofcom and PhonepayPlus, as well as commercial disputes between operators. His experience in the sector includes telecoms-related issues of: broadcasting; competition law; dispute resolution by Ofcom; Francovich damages; intellectual property; internet-law and e-commerce; procurement; regulatory investigations; regulatory reform; and spectrum auctions, licensing and management.
“Tom Richards was good at getting to the nub of the issue and giving advice, and always very good at being accommodating.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Super bright and an excellent advocate. A real star of the future.”
Legal 500, 2024
“He is smart and super commercial.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Tom Richards is extremely bright and user-friendly.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Super bright and an excellent advocate. A real star of the future.”
Legal 500, 2023
“He is a super bright barrister and is fantastic to work with.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“A true star junior.”
Legal 500, 2022
“Tom is excellent. Seriously bright, highly personable and an absolute pleasure to work with. He has a measured and calm approach coupled with an ability to run with complex legal issues and arguments with ease.”
Legal 500, 2022
“He is responsive and he is always willing to take a lead on everything.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“He understands the business and the telecoms sector well.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“QC of the future; first-choice junior counsel.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He is extremely user-friendly and seamlessly integrates into any team.”
Legal 500, 2019
“A first-class junior with commercial savviness far beyond his years.”
Chambers UK, 2016
“His advice is clearly structured, accessible and commercial”
Legal 500, 2016
“He is a super bright barrister and is fantastic to work with”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“Tom is excellent. Seriously bright, highly personable and an absolute pleasure to work with. He has a measured and calm approach coupled with an ability to run with complex legal issues and arguments with ease. A true star junior”
Legal 500, 2022
Junior counsel for Telefónica, the operator of the O2 network, resisting an appeal by Ofcom against an order for restitution of very substantial licence fees.
Acted for Telefónica in a challenge to Ofcom’s decision on Annual Licence Fees.
Acted for Churchcastle defending regulatory proceedings brought by the premium rate phone services regulator, which had sought to impose its largest ever fine (£800,000) upon Churchcastle.
Acted for Playboy in regulatory proceedings brought by Ofcom as co-regulator of On Demand Programme Services.
Appeared as sole counsel for Telefónica in a CAT appeal against a determination by Ofcom concerning “flip-flopping” of termination rates by H3G and Vodafone.
Classics & English, BA Hons (Oxon); Diploma in Law (City)
VAT registration number: 912037952
Barristers regulated by the Bar Standards Board
Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Derek Sutton
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7327
Adam Sloane
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7326
Dean Tolman
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7331
Billy Brian
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7339
Marc Armstrong
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7330
Adam Fuschillo
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7329
Danny Compton
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7338
Sophie Reeve
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7324
Toby Dennison
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7328
Daniel Higgins
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7322
Lilly-Grace Hilliard
Clerk
+44 (0)20 7822 7234