Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Robert Howe is recognised by both of the leading independent legal directories as a leading silk in a number of practice areas, including commercial litigation, civil fraud and asset recovery, intellectual property, sport, and employment law.
Robert has extensive experience across a broad range of commercial litigation, both advisory and at trial. He has appeared frequently in all divisions of the High Court, in commercial arbitrations, and at appellate level in large and complex disputes.
Robert is a leader in the field of media & entertainment and intellectual property. He is regularly instructed by major publishers and record companies, well-known artists and entertainers, and the collecting societies. He has appeared in a number of the leading cases in this area, including Pink Floyd v EMI (exploitation of digital singles), Newspaper Licensing Agency v Meltwater News (digital rights in an online news service), English Cricket Board v Tixdaq Ltd (the fair dealing defence), and Warner Music UK Ltd v TuneIn Inc (hyperlinks and the communication to the public right).
Robert is recognised by latest editions of both the leading independent legal directories for his expertise in dispute resolution, commercial litigation, employment, civil law, intellectual property, international arbitration and media & entertainment. Key recent quotes include:
Previous comments include:
Robert appears regularly in all divisions of the High Court in complex commercial disputes, and in commercial arbitrations. He has extensive advocacy and trial experience, including in lengthy witness actions. He is also frequently instructed in the appellate courts.
He has particular expertise in civil fraud and asset recovery, and complex issues of private international law and jurisdiction, having appeared in a number of the leading cases in this field, such as Kuwait Oil Tanker Corporation v Al Bader [2000] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 271 (CA), Memory v Sidhu (No 1) [2000] 1 W.L.R. 1443 (CA), Donohue v Armco. [2001] 1 Ll Rep 425 (Comm) (HL) and In the Matter of Bloomsbury International (in Administration) [2010] EWHC 1150 (Ch). For the past few years he has been instructed for the claimants in the long-running Kazakhstan Kagazy fraud litigation, which successfully concluded in February 2018 with a $300 million judgment for the claimants, after a lengthy Commercial Court trial.
“Robert is a phenomenally strategic litigator and an impressive advocate. He is always thoroughly prepared and immersed in the case and detail.”
Legal 500, 2025
“Robert is very strategic and thoughtful, able to stand back and look at the facts.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“A calm and authoritative advocate at the peak of his powers.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Extremely well prepared, he understands all of the detail and is trusted by judges.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“He is excellent and a first-class advocate. He is extremely calm, highly intelligent, and clients are in very safe hands with Robert on their side.”
Legal 500, 2024
“There is not a single detail of a case which he overlooks. He is a very logical man and all his arguments are dictated by eternal logic.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“He makes complicated matters seem very simple.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Robert is a stunning advocate, who is able to deal with complex matters of law and inspire client confidence.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Technically excellent, clients and Judges respect him, very user friendly.”
Legal 500, 2023
“He brings amazing gravitas in significant and serious pieces of litigation.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“Robert produces excellent written work. He is very analytical in his approach and is able to quickly cut through and identify the key issues”
Legal 500, 2022
“His advice is clear, detailed, practical and commercial.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“He is a ferocious cross-examiner and a very persuasive advocate.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He's very easy to work with, very thorough, always well prepared and tactically very good.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“Robert has a really good eye for strategy and really good instincts, and is always on top of the detail.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“Gets straight to the heart of a matter, has the attention of the court, and devastates opponents with his advocacy.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“He's like a machine – he takes all kinds of complicated points and churns through them.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“He gets to the heart of the matter, has the attention of the court, and can devastate opponents with his advocacy.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“A fantastic silk and excellent with clients.”
Legal 500, 2018
“He gets straight to the heart of the matter, holds the attention of the court and devastates opponents with his advocacy”
Chambers and Partners, 2017
“A trusted resource when swift advice is required on complicated conflicts of law issues. He has the aura of confidence that clients find reassuring.”
Chambers and Partners, 2016
“A really top advocate, who is accessible and hands-on”
Legal 500, 2016
“A strong all-rounder and excellent advocate who provides well-researched advice.”
Legal 500, 2015
Instructed for Shell Plc against ClientEarth’s unsuccessful attempt to obtain permission to proceed with a derivative action for alleged breaches of directors' duties regarding the company’s climate risk policies.
Instructed for major sports body in relation to claim for substantial payments in respect of sports rights agreement.
Instructed for the respondent solicitors in a dispute over privilege concerning a number of important documents arising out of an ongoing commercial fraud claim for c. $2 billion.
Instructed for the claimant betting company re claims in the CAT and the High Court concerning the grant of exclusive sports data rights in respect of the Premier League.
Instructed for five defendants in a c.$250 million claim concerning the collapse and sale of one of Uganda’s largest banks. It is alleged that the sale was the result of a corrupt scheme and unlawful means conspiracy, involving various Ministers of the Ugandan Government, and the Bank of Uganda.
Instructed for the claimant, the Premier League, in a successful $215 million claim for sums due under various agreements granting rights in the Far East for the broadcasting of Premier League matches.
Instructed for the claimants in a successful c. £20 million claim against a competitor and former employees for breach of duties, breach of confidence and infringements of copyright and database rights.
Instructed for defendant in successful dismissal of attempt by casino to enforce alleged unpaid balance under a settlement agreement.
Acted for the successful claimants in a $300 million international fraud claim against former shareholders and officers of the claimants. Obtained judgment for $300 million following trial.
A highly complex, multi-jurisdictional international fraud case, involving a large number of contested hearings and leading, reported Commercial Court decisions, including:
[2015] EWHC 3059 (Comm) – dismissal of applications for summary judgment and discharge of freezing orders
[2016] EWHC 2363 (Comm) – disclosure, discontinuance and jurisdiction
[2017] EWHC 3374 (Comm) – 300+ page main judgment following trial
[2018] EWHC 369 (Comm) – concluding judgment, complex issues of damages and interest, resulting in final judgment for the claimants for $300 million (plus costs).
[2019] EWHC 80 (Comm) | [2019] 1 WLUK 151 – judgment ordering extensive additional disclosure of assets under Worldwide Freezing Order.
[2019] EWHC 97 (Comm) | [2019] 1 WLUK 165 – judgment considering variations of Worldwide Freezing Orders and Charging Orders over a number of valuable London properties (c. £50 million), to allow the properties to be leased pending resolution of the claims.
[2019] EWHC 878 (Comm) | [2019] 4 WLUK 96 – judgment ordering extensive disclosure under the new Disclosure Pilot Scheme
[2019] EWHC 1693 (Comm) | [2019] 6 WLUK 508 – judgment ordering cross-examination of the defendant’s wife on her assets, as part of the enforcement of a Worldwide Freezing Order
[2019] EWHC 2630 (Comm) [2019] 10 WLUK 83 - a rare Third Party Order for costs order, for £13.2 million under Section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, against defendant’s wife and mother-in-law on the grounds that they had funded the defendant’s defence.
Instructed for the defendant US investment fund in a $500 million dispute over the ownership of an online games company (the publisher of "Runescape"). Obtained an order for £35m fortification of an injunction.
Instructed for the defendant, one of India’s best-known businessmen, in a $700 million claim under a personal guarantee.
Instructed for the defendant, Bank of America Merrill Lynch in $850 million dispute with a Vincent Tchenguiz property group, concerning issues arising out of termination of the loan facility and interest rate & inflation swaps.
Instructed by claimant, PwC LLP, in injunction proceedings in support of an arbitration against a former partner for breaches of contract and enforcement of restrictive covenants.
Instructed for the defendant in claim against a former director and shareholder. One of a number of concurrent proceedings arising out of a dispute concerning a private equity investment in the family company.
Instructed for claimant, HPE, in £20m claim against suppliers concerning substantial conspiracy to defraud.
Instructed for claimant, HP, in $50 claims against suppliers concerning unauthorised sale of goods, fraudulent international conspiracy and trade mark infringement.
Instructed for the sovereign defendant, the Republic of Venezuela, in claim concerning $20 million in bonds, and $1.2 bn gold reserves held at the Bank of England.
Instructed for defendant estate of Iraqi businessman in $45 million Commercial Court claim for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations, concerning ownership and $1bn sale of a Iraqi telecoms network.
Instructed for claimants in a $175m claim concerning arising out of a shareholders’ dispute involving two Saudi Princes. Complex matter raising contested issues of sovereign immunity, jurisdiction, fraud, privacy and default judgments, including two interim Court of Appeal hearings.
Instructed for claimant, HP, in claims against suppliers concerning conspiracy to defraud.
Instructed for defendant in Euro 40 million conspiracy and conversion claim, arising out of dispute concerning a large shipment of sugar.
Instructed for defendant in £10m claim by former employee for alleged ownership share, salary and bonus, from financial advisory LLP.
Instructed for claimant, HP, in $17 million fraud and breach of contract claim concerning multi-jurisdictional supplies of black and grey market HP products.
Instructed for claimant in £3 million fraud claim against former employee.
Instructed a leading professional services firm in a substantial arbitrations against former partners.
Instructed for claimant in action for anti-suit injunction to restrain Californian proceedings.
Instructed for the defendant in a dispute concerning the recognition and enforcement of an $11m Arizona judgment.
Instructed for the Central Bank of Laos in application to discharge freezing injunction; and subsequent claim for damages under the cross-undertaking.
Instructed for Compass Group in claim arising out of termination of a hospital outsourcing contract.
Instructed for Samsung in jurisdictional aspects of global dispute concerning infringement of various IP rights (in iPads, iPhones, etc).
Instructed for defendant (subsidiary of Barratt Homes) in £30 million claim concerning proposed housing development.
Robert appears regularly in all divisions of the High Court in complex commercial disputes, and in commercial arbitrations. He has extensive advocacy and trial experience, including in lengthy witness actions. He is also frequently instructed in the appellate courts.
He has particular expertise in civil fraud and asset recovery, and complex issues of private international law and jurisdiction, having appeared in a number of the leading cases in this field, such as Kuwait Oil Tanker Corporation v Al Bader [2000] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 271 (CA), Memory v Sidhu (No 1) [2000] 1 W.L.R. 1443 (CA), Donohue v Armco. [2001] 1 Ll Rep 425 (Comm) (HL) and In the Matter of Bloomsbury International (in Administration) [2010] EWHC 1150 (Ch). For the past few years he has been instructed for the claimants in the long-running Kazakhstan Kagazy fraud litigation, which successfully concluded in February 2018 with a $300 million judgment for the claimants, after a lengthy Commercial Court trial.
“Robert Howe is quick, clever and no-nonsense. He gets to the nub of a matter at the speed of light and delivers clear and concise advice.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Robert is very strategic and thoughtful, able to stand back and look at the facts.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Robert is very approachable, responsive and user-friendly.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“He is user-friendly, responsive and on top of all of the issues.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Robert is an excellent advocate who has a powerful way of speaking and presenting a case. He has command of the courtroom and is on top of all of the details of a case.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“A strategic thinker, Robert carefully guides complex cases through choppy waters. A silky-smooth advocate, he has complete mastery of the detail and makes even the driest and most complex issues accessible and interesting.”
Legal 500, 2023
“He has a very keen mind which cuts straight to the heart of the issue and puts that across in an easy and persuasive manner.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“He brings amazing gravitas in significant and serious pieces of litigation.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“Absolutely stellar”
Legal 500, 2022
“A very thorough advocate who is incredibly precise and meticulous.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“The best leader in this area by far, he destroys opponents in court with ease – you always want Robert on your side rather than against you.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He's a fantastic advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“He's user-friendly, very bright and clients like him.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“Excellent on his feet and very bright.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“He gets to the heart of the matter, has the attention of the court, and can devastate opponents with his advocacy.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“Excellent on his feet and very bright.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“A very, very clever and good black letter lawyer.”
Chambers and Partners, 2016
Instructed for five defendants in a c.$250 million claim concerning the collapse and sale of one of Uganda’s largest banks. It is alleged that the sale was the result of a corrupt scheme and unlawful means conspiracy, involving various Ministers of the Ugandan Government, and the Bank of Uganda.
Acted for the successful claimants in a $300 million international fraud claim against former shareholders and officers of the claimants. Obtained judgment for $300 million following trial.
A highly complex, multi-jurisdictional international fraud case, involving a large number of contested hearings and leading, reported Commercial Court decisions, including:
[2015] EWHC 3059 (Comm) – dismissal of applications for summary judgment and discharge of freezing orders
[2016] EWHC 2363 (Comm) – disclosure, discontinuance and jurisdiction
[2017] EWHC 3374 (Comm) – 300+ page main judgment following trial
[2018] EWHC 369 (Comm) – concluding judgment, complex issues of damages and interest, resulting in final judgment for the claimants for $300 million (plus costs).
[2019] EWHC 80 (Comm) | [2019] 1 WLUK 151 – judgment ordering extensive additional disclosure of assets under Worldwide Freezing Order.
[2019] EWHC 97 (Comm) | [2019] 1 WLUK 165 – judgment considering variations of Worldwide Freezing Orders and Charging Orders over a number of valuable London properties (c. £50 million), to allow the properties to be leased pending resolution of the claims.
[2019] EWHC 878 (Comm) | [2019] 4 WLUK 96 – judgment ordering extensive disclosure under the new Disclosure Pilot Scheme
[2019] EWHC 1693 (Comm) | [2019] 6 WLUK 508 – judgment ordering cross-examination of the defendant’s wife on her assets, as part of the enforcement of a Worldwide Freezing Order
[2019] EWHC 2630 (Comm) [2019] 10 WLUK 83 - a rare Third Party Order for costs order, for £13.2 million under Section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, against defendant’s wife and mother-in-law on the grounds that they had funded the defendant’s defence.
Instructed for claimant, HPE, in £20m claim against suppliers concerning substantial conspiracy to defraud.
Instructed for defendant in Euro 40 million conspiracy and conversion claim, arising out of dispute concerning a large shipment of sugar.
Instructed for defendant estate of Iraqi businessman in $45 million Commercial Court claim for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations, concerning ownership and $1bn sale of a Iraqi telecoms network.
Instructed for claimant, HP, in claims against suppliers concerning conspiracy to defraud.
Instructed for claimant, HP, in $50 claims against suppliers concerning unauthorised sale of goods, fraudulent international conspiracy and trade mark infringement.
Instructed for claimants in a $175m claim concerning arising out of a shareholders’ dispute involving two Saudi Princes. Complex matter raising contested issues of sovereign immunity, jurisdiction, fraud, privacy and default judgments, including two interim Court of Appeal hearings.
Instructed for the Central Bank of Laos in application to discharge freezing injunction; and subsequent claim for damages under the cross-undertaking.
Instructed for claimant, HP, in $17 million fraud and breach of contract claim concerning multi-jurisdictional supplies of black and grey market HP products.
Instructed for medical products company in breach of contract, infringement, and conspiracy claim against former finance director.
Instructed for claimant in £3 million fraud claim against former employee.
Instructed for claimant in action for anti-suit injunction to restrain Californian proceedings.
Robert is recognised as a leading silk in this field. He has acted in many matters in this area (involving both contract and intellectual property issues). Has acted for all the major record companies, a number of collecting societies (MCPS, PRS, PPL, NLA, CLA), many major media organisations, and many well-known groups and artists.
He is also frequently instructed, for applicants and collecting societies, in a number of Copyright Tribunal references, including the recent landmark Online Tribunal reference (which set terms for the digital and mobile exploitation of musical works).
“He is fantastically knowledgeable on very complex copyright matters. He's a brilliant advocate, one of the best. He deals with judges, questioning extremely well, and never loses his cool.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“He's a brilliant practitioner in this field. He has a seriously impressive eye for detail and is lovely on his feet.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Robert is reliably incisive and clear in his advice; he doesn't shy away from telling clients what they need to hear.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Considered with his advice, a superb advocate who can read a judge and the tribunal really well. He is a good tactician, fits well into the team and listens to ideas.”
Legal 500, 2024
“One of the best KCs for copyright and media disputes; he is incredibly bright and commercial.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Robert is user-friendly, gets to grips with the issues quickly and provides very clear advice.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Concise, very good at identifying and explaining the issues to clients, incisive, and excellent at cross examination.”
Legal 500, 2023
“He is an excellent cross-examiner, and gets involved and rolls his sleeves up; he's one of the best in the area.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“He knows the industry very well and is great at very complex and technical issues”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“Robert has a thorough understanding of copyright law coupled with significant practical experience, making him a go-to advocate when it comes to complex and high-value litigation in the media world.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“Exceptionally talented in all areas, and very calm and insightful in court.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He understands the music business very well, is incredibly detailed and forensic in his approach.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He is extremely bright, very client-friendly and he understands the importance to the client of providing concise yet detailed and well-considered advice.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“An excellent advocate who is masterful at trial.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“He always gives excellent advice, combining the legal with the practical.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“Robert is superb - he is one of those silks who can really get into the detail and is a very impressive advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“Commentators highlight his strong oral advocacy and presentation skills.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“His advice is always spot on.”
Legal 500, 2018
“He can read a judge or a tribunal extremely well, so his judgement in terms of how to pitch things is spot-on in terms of tone”
Chambers and Partners, 2017
“He is the first choice for any complex rights-related claims.”
Legal 500, 2017
“He's very good to work with; a real team player and very accessible.”
Chambers and Partners, 2016
“His advocacy and cross-examination are a masterclass”
Legal 500, 2016
Instructed for the Defendant, Sony, in a multi-jurisdictional dispute concerning copyrights and performers’ rights in Jimi Hendrix’s recordings
Instructed by defendant Tune-In Inc (a global online platform for radio stations), against Warner/Sony in leading case concerning provision of music online. The case raises the difficult and fundamental issue of whether (and if so when) hyperlinks are a form of “communication to the public”, and accordingly whether they need to be licensed or not.
Instructed by the hospitality industry trade bodies, representing UK pubs, restaurants, hotels and nightclubs, in major Copyright Tribunal proceedings against PPL regarding its proposed tariff for playing music at special events (such as discos, dances, parties etc).
Instructed by PRS for Music in major Copyright Tribunal proceedings against BBC re its broadcasting and production licences.
Instructed for claimants, Force India Formula One Team, in $45 million claim for monies said to be due under a sponsorship agreement with Diageo, the global drinks giant.
Instructed by PRS for Music in Copyright Tribunal dispute with ITV regarding its £70 million main broadcasting licence.
Instructed for claimants, the ECB and Sky, in copyright infringement claim against an online service using clips of broadcast matches. The decision is a leading case on the fair dealing exception.
Instructed for defendant in £10 million claim arising out of licensing of Premier and other League listings.
Instructed by licensing body in Copyright Tribunal, High Court and Court of Appeal and Supreme Court concerning web news aggregators.
Instructed for defendant, British Horseracing Board, in claim concerning licensing of horseracing fixture lists.
Instructed for the defendant, Parlophone/EMI, in claim concerning exploitation of digital rights, against the well-known band, Marillion.
Instructed for Parlophone in dispute with the band Radiohead, concerning digital royalties.
Instructed for PRS in dispute concerning rights over Bollywood songs.
Instructed for Samsung in jurisdictional aspects of global dispute concerning infringement of various IP rights (in iPads, iPhones, etc).
Robert is frequently instructed in a wide range of commercial arbitrations, including applications for ancillary relief in the Commercial Court. He is also on the PPL Panel of Arbitrators.
“A silky-smooth advocate, he has complete mastery of the detail and makes even the driest and most complex issues accessible and interesting.”
Legal 500, 2023
“An exceptional QC and advocate. Calm, but firm and hugely clever.”
Legal 500, 2022
“He gets on top of the details very quickly and brings an incisive intellect to the analysis of a case.”
Legal 500, 2021
“His advice is always spot on.”
Legal 500, 2018
“Very much a go-to guy, he has a razor-sharp mind.”
Legal 500, 2017
“A really top-rate advocate, who is very easy to work with”
Legal 500, 2016
“An exceptional black-letter lawyer and very good logician.”
Legal 500, 2015
Instructed for major sports body in relation to claim for substantial payments in respect of sports rights agreement.
Instructed by claimant, PwC LLP, in injunction proceedings in support of an arbitration against a former partner for breaches of contract and enforcement of restrictive covenants.
Instructed for respondent in an LCIA Arbitration arising out of settlement of substantial Cayman Islands and Commercial Court proceedings.
Instructed a leading professional services firm in a substantial arbitrations against former partners.
Instructed for PPI Services Supply Company in highly complex contractual dispute and adjudication concerning interlocking PPI construction and service supply contracts.
Instructed for Respondent in an LCIA Arbitration re £2 million sale of goods dispute concerning a shipment of metals.
Instructed in a set of LCIA arbitrations concerning $650 million shareholder dispute re development of a Caribbean island.
Instructed for respondent in an LCIA Arbitration arising out of settlement of substantial Cayman Islands and Commercial Court proceedings.
Instructed in LCIA arbitration concerning a multi-million $ claim for indemnity arising out of settlement of previous Cayman Island and English High Court proceedings.
Instructed for defendant in Lloyd’s of London disciplinary proceedings, concerning alleged miscalculation of reserves and related matters.
Dispute between sporting bodies concerning allocation of broadcasting revenues.
Dispute arising out of enforcement of arbitration award in an arbitration concerning Bermuda Form policy.
Sitting as arbitrator in dispute concerning termination of a publishing contract of well-known songwriter.
Robert has acted and advised in a number of financial services/regulatory disputes, including those below.
Instructed for the defendant, Bank of America Merrill Lynch in $850 million dispute with a Vincent Tchenguiz property group, concerning issues arising out of termination of the loan facility and interest rate & inflation swaps.
Instructed for defendant actuaries in £1 bn claim arising out of collapse of Independent Insurance.
Acted for a director of investment management company in claim for breach of investment mandate.
Represented an LME member in disciplinary proceedings brought by the LME.
Advised global insurance companies in conflicts of laws and jurisdiction disputes arising out of multi-national insurance policies.
Robert Howe is frequently instructed in High Court employment proceedings, including actions to enforce restrictive covenants, and large claims for wrongful dismissal.
“A silk with the ear of the court.”
Legal 500, 2025
“He is supremely smooth and confident and great with witnesses.”
Legal 500, 2024
“He is extremely bright and unflappable.”
Legal 500, 2022
“In all hearings, he is the strongest QC in the room.”
Legal 500, 2022
“Hugely talented, and the best advocate and litigator solicitors have instructed in their careers.”
Legal 500, 2022
“Incredibly bright and engaging – a fearsome advocate who instills confidence in clients.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He has frightening intelligence.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“He is tremendous.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“A fantastic advocate who is exceptionally bright.”
Legal 500, 2018
“Fearsomely bright and brilliant on his feet in court.”
Chambers and Partners, 2017
“An exceptionally bright and skilled advocate.”
Legal 500, 2017
“An excellent advocate, who is very good all round.”
Legal 500, 2016
Instructed for the claimants in a successful c. £20 million claim against a competitor and former employees for breach of duties, breach of confidence and infringements of copyright and database rights.
Instructed by claimant, PwC LLP, in injunction proceedings in support of an arbitration against a former partner for breaches of contract and enforcement of restrictive covenants.
Instructed for the defendant in claim against a former director and shareholder. One of a number of concurrent proceedings arising out of a dispute concerning a private equity investment in the family company.
Instructed for former employee, who had held a very senior position at IBM, in claim concerning alleged breaches of restrictive covenants and confidentiality.
Instructed for employer in breach of convenant and breach of confidence claim against former employee.
Instructed for medical products company in breach of contract, infringement, and conspiracy claim against former finance director.
Instructed for defendant architect in substantial team move claim by former employer.
Instructed for defendant in £25 million team move case.
Robert has advised, and acted for, sporting bodies, clubs and players in disciplinary, arbitration and court proceedings, especially concerning sporting and media rights.
“Robert is a super smooth advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“He is measured, very intelligent, tenacious and will get to the bottom of issues.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“Absolutely first rate: a brilliant mind and a very reassuring presence in hearings.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“Robert is superb - he is one of those silks who can really get into the detail and is a very impressive advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“An exceptionally bright and incisive mind.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“He is a reassuring presence on big-ticket cases and a skilful advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“Whenever we've got a tricky issue, he's the one to go to. He's a very smart guy who's very accessible and takes a practical approach to things”
Chambers and Partners, 2017
“He's impressive; his client service is outstanding, he's pleasant to deal with, and he's a very smooth advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2016
Instructed for major sports body in relation to claim for substantial payments in respect of sports rights agreement.
Instructed for the claimant betting company re claims in the CAT and the High Court concerning the grant of exclusive sports data rights in respect of the Premier League.
Instructed for the claimant, the Premier League, in a successful $215 million claim for sums due under various agreements granting rights in the Far East for the broadcasting of Premier League matches.
Instructed for claimants, Force India Formula One Team, in $45 million claim for monies said to be due under a sponsorship agreement with Diageo, the global drinks giant.
Instructed for claimants, the ECB and Sky, in copyright infringement claim against an online service using clips of broadcast matches. The decision is a leading case on the fair dealing exception.
Instructed for defendant in £10 million claim arising out of licensing of Premier and other League listings.
Instructed for defendant, British Horseracing Board, in claim concerning licensing of horseracing fixture lists.
Advised Formula One Team in dispute concerning supplier contract.
Represented Premier League clubs in disciplinary proceedings brought by the FA.
Acted for Formula One team in FIA proceedings.
Robert is recognised as a leading silk in this field. He has acted in many matters in this area (involving both contract and intellectual property issues). Has acted for all the major record companies, a number of collecting societies (MCPS, PRS, PPL, NLA, CLA), many major media organisations, and many well-known groups and artists.
He is also frequently instructed, for applicants and collecting societies, in a number of Copyright Tribunal references, including the recent landmark Online Tribunal reference (which set terms for the digital and mobile exploitation of musical works).
“Robert is fantastically knowledgeable in complex copyright matters. He is extremely responsive and a brilliant advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Considered with his advice, a superb advocate who can read a judge and the tribunal really well. He is a good tactician, fits well into the team and listens to ideas.”
Legal 500, 2024
“One of the best KCs for copyright and media disputes; he is incredibly bright and commercial.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Robert is user-friendly, gets to grips with the issues quickly and provides very clear advice.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Concise, very good at identifying and explaining the issues to clients, incisive, and excellent at cross examination.”
Legal 500, 2023
“He is an excellent cross-examiner, and gets involved and rolls his sleeves up; he's one of the best in the area.”
Chambers and Partners, 2022
“He knows the industry very well and is great at very complex and technical issues”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“Robert has a thorough understanding of copyright law coupled with significant practical experience, making him a go-to advocate when it comes to complex and high-value litigation in the media world.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“Exceptionally talented in all areas, and very calm and insightful in court.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He understands the music business very well, is incredibly detailed and forensic in his approach.”
Legal 500, 2021
“He is extremely bright, very client-friendly and he understands the importance to the client of providing concise yet detailed and well-considered advice.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“An excellent advocate who is masterful at trial.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“Robert is superb - he is one of those silks who can really get into the detail and is a very impressive advocate.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“Commentators highlight his strong oral advocacy and presentation skills.”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
“His advice is always spot on.”
Legal 500, 2018
“He can read a judge or a tribunal extremely well, so his judgement in terms of how to pitch things is spot-on in terms of tone”
Chambers and Partners, 2017
“He is the first choice for any complex rights-related claims.”
Legal 500, 2017
“He's very good to work with; a real team player and very accessible.”
Chambers and Partners, 2016
“His advocacy and cross-examination are a masterclass”
Legal 500, 2016
Instructed for the Defendant, Sony, in a multi-jurisdictional dispute concerning copyrights and performers’ rights in Jimi Hendrix’s recordings
Instructed for defendant in a dispute concerning Oxford University’s intellectual property rights over inventions by students
Instructed for claimants, Force India Formula One Team, in $45 million claim for monies said to be due under a sponsorship agreement with Diageo, the global drinks giant.
Instructed by defendant Tune-In Inc (a global online platform for radio stations), against Warner/Sony in leading case concerning provision of music online. The case raises the difficult and fundamental issue of whether (and if so when) hyperlinks are a form of “communication to the public”, and accordingly whether they need to be licensed or not.
Instructed by PRS for Music in major Copyright Tribunal proceedings against BBC re its broadcasting and production licences.
Instructed for claimants, the ECB and Sky, in copyright infringement claim against an online service using clips of broadcast matches. The decision is a leading case on the fair dealing exception.
Instructed for defendant in £10 million claim arising out of licensing of Premier and other League listings.
Instructed for defendant, British Horseracing Board, in claim concerning licensing of horseracing fixture lists.
Instructed by licensing body in Copyright Tribunal, High Court and Court of Appeal and Supreme Court concerning web news aggregators.
Instructed for PRS in dispute concerning rights over Bollywood songs.
Instructed for Samsung in jurisdictional aspects of global dispute concerning infringement of various IP rights (in iPads, iPhones, etc).
Instructed by the hospitality industry trade bodies, representing UK pubs, restaurants, hotels and nightclubs, in major Copyright Tribunal proceedings against PPL regarding its proposed tariff for playing music at special events (such as discos, dances, parties etc).
Robert is a contributor to “Employee Competition: Covenants, Confidentiality and Garden Leave” (OUP 2007). He is co-author of the chapter on Confidentiality and Database Rights.
VAT registration number: 524278348
Barristers regulated by the Bar Standards Board
Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Derek Sutton
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7327
Adam Sloane
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7326
Dean Tolman
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7331
Billy Brian
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7339
Marc Armstrong
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7330
Adam Fuschillo
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7329
Danny Compton
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7338
Sophie Reeve
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7324
Toby Dennison
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7328
Daniel Higgins
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7322
Lilly-Grace Hilliard
Clerk
+44 (0)20 7822 7234