Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Natasha practises in public law and human rights, regulatory and competition law; as well as related areas such as information law, commercial law, international law and sport. She is frequently instructed in high profile judicial reviews up to and including the Supreme Court, and regularly appears in appeals before the Competition and Markets Authority and Competition Appeals Tribunal.
Natasha's academic background is in economics and law. She holds a BCL, MPhil and DPhil in Law from the University of Oxford and first class undergraduate degrees from the University of Sydney. Natasha’s DPhil was in public international law. Prior to coming to the Bar, Natasha spent several years teaching law at the University of Oxford, King's College London and the Faculté Libre du Droit Paris. She has also previously worked as a consultant on human rights issues for various United Nations agencies and NGOs, having qualified as a solicitor in Australia.
Natasha is a member of the Attorney General’s C Panel of Counsel.
Natasha is ranked in both Chambers & Partners and Legal 500. Recent comments include:
Previous comments include:
Natasha practises in all areas of public and administrative law.
In addition to her academic work on public law and human rights, Natasha has worked on a number of public and regulatory law cases before the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, Competition and Markets Authority and Competition Appeals Tribunal, for both claimants and respondents.
Natasha is a member of the Attorney General’s C Panel of Counsel.
“She's extremely good to work with. She is extremely bright and drafts very well.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“Natasha is truly excellent. Her advice is clear, strategic and very effective. She enhances any claim she is involved in.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“She is incredibly bright, a brilliant drafter and delightful to work with.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“She is extraordinarily clever, and a good strategist.”
Legal 500, 2025
“She has the combination of quality written work, good judgement and knowledge of various areas of law.”
Chambers UK, 2024
“Natasha is accessible and provides a high quality of legal service.”
Chambers UK, 2024
“An absolute superstar. She is phenomenally bright, extremely creative and just lovely to work with.”
Legal 500, 2024
“Natasha is extremely approachable and has an amazing work ethic. I am looking forward to watching the development of her career at the Bar.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
“Natasha is a brilliant junior. Her written submissions are sharp, concise and convincing, and she has an excellent way with clients.”
Chambers and Partners, 2023
A group of Tamil migrants who have been stranded on Diego Garcia in the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”) for three years will be admitted to the UK, it has been announced. This follows extensive litigation in the Administrative Court in London and well as the BIOT Supreme Court and Court of Appeal. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
Acting for the Appellants in their appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council against the decision of the Anguillan courts to dismiss a claim for judicial review. The factual background is the Anguillan financial crisis of 2015 and the resolution plan implemented by the government and central bank to stabilise the banking system, but which excluded the Appellants’ deposits from protection. Led by David Pievsky KC.
Advising in relation to commercial judicial review of allegedly unlawful decisions of the FOS.
Acting for Ofcom in a challenge to the decision not to investigate the Claimant’s complaints as to the BBC’s coverage of the EU and of issues surrounding the UK’s exit from the EU. Led by Jessica Boyd KC.
Successfully defended the decision to grant limited bail to migrants on the British island of Diego Garcia in the British Indian Ocean Territory Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal expressed its concern about the welfare of all the migrants on the island, and particularly the children. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
The Court of Appeal of the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”) handed down its first judgment in more than 40 years. The case concerns a number of Tamil asylum seekers who have been the island of Diego Garcia in the BIOT since September 2021. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
The Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”) handed down judgment in relation to a claim for judicial review and applications for wardship brought on behalf of a number of Tamil asylum-seekers who have been stranded on the island of Diego Garcia in the BIOT for some 2.5 years. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
The Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”) handed down judgment in VT, CT & Ors v Commissioner for the BIOT (BIOT SC/No.3/2023). This was an application for judicial review of the Defendant’s refusal to determine claims for legal aid on behalf of ten impecunious asylum seekers who have been held on the island of Diego Garcia since October 2021. The Supreme Court held that the statutory and common law rights to legal aid in English law also apply in BIOT, contrary to the submissions of the Commissioner. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
The High Court (Whipple LJ and Chamberlain J) declined to grant interim relief to the Applicants, five ethnic Tamil asylum seekers. The Applicants had previously resided in refugee camps in India, from where they set out by boat in September 2021, before being rescued by the Royal Navy and taken to the island of Diego Garcia in the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”).
Acting for the Judicial Appointments Commission (instructed by the Government Legal Department) in relation to an application for information concerning competitions for judicial appointment.
Acting for HM Treasuring (instructed by the Government Legal Department) in relation to an application for information concerning relocation of a multinational corporation’s headquarters to the UK.
Acting for the BBC as Interested Party in a judicial review challenge to the BBC’s launch of Radio 1 Dance (an online stream of dance music available via the BBC Sounds app) (led by Monica Carss-Frisk KC).
Acted for the Claimant in an application for judicial review of the introduction of voter identification requirements in local government elections (led by Anthony Peto KC in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, and by Michael Fordham KC, as he then was, at first instance).
Acting for the Claimants in this judicial review challenge to the Prime Minister’s decision not to order an independent judge-led inquiry into UK complicity in torture and rendition (led by Ben Jaffey QC). Judgment was handed down by the Divisional Court on a preliminary issue (the appropriate standard of disclosure in closed material proceedings concerning national security) and an application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal is outstanding. The substantive hearing is listed in January 2020.
Advising a regulatory body on competition law constraints upon its commercial activities (led by Jessica Boyd KC).
Acted for GEMA in the Energy Licence Modification Appeals before the CMA, led by Gerry Facenna KC.
Acted for the claimant NGO in a judicial review challenge to the failure to investigate allegations of Russian interference in UK democratic elections.
Acting for the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority as the Interested Party in a challenge to the CMA's decision in the Energy Licence Modification Appeals (with Daniel Cashman). Decision under appeal.
Acted for the successful Defendant in an application for judicial review of Ofwat's compliance with the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (led by Hanif Mussa KC).
Advising techUK and some of its member entities on data protection obligations and the legal gateways to data sharing, including in relation to the Data Protection Acts and the GDPR
Acted for the Claimant, Mr Coughlan, in a judicial review of the government’s pilot schemes for voter identification in the May 2019 local government elections. The Claimant contended that the voter ID scheme was ultra vires the Representation of the People Act 2000 and did not reflect the constitutional significance of the right to vote. Natasha was led by Michael Fordham QC (as he then was) in the High Court proceedings in March 2019, and by Anthony Peto QC in the Court of Appeal in April 2020. An application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court remains outstanding.
Acted for the claimant in this application for judicial review of the decision of the SFO to suspend an independent investigation (with Michael Fordham QC, Jason Pobjoy and Hollie Higgins).
Natasha is instructed (led by Ben Jaffey QC) to act for Reprieve, David Davis MP and Dan Jarvis MP in an application for judicial review of the Government's decision not to order an independent judge-led inquiry into UK complicity into torture and rendition post 9/11.
Acted for the Defendant (led by David Pievsky) in an application for judicial review of the Secretary of State's decision to transfer governance from the claimant Fire Authorities to the local Police and Crime Commissioners. The Court found in favour of the Defendants and refused permission to appeal.
Acted for the Claimant in an application for judicial review of a proposal for local government reorganisation in Dorset under the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007.
Application for judicial review of a decision of the FSCS denying compensation to victims of mis-selling of ARM bonds (assisting Ben Jaffey QC)
(Led by Andrew Green QC) advised a prospective commercial claimant on the prospects of successfully challenging a determination of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Competition Appeal Tribunal trial concerning BT's challenge to Ofcom's business connectivity market review (assisting Tristan Jones, Mark Vinall and Daniel Cashman).
Challenge to the lawfulness of the Security Services' collection and retention of bulk data (assisting Thomas de la Mare QC, Ben Jaffey QC and Daniel Cashman)
Trial of preliminary issue as to whether a railway training accreditation body is an "undertaking" for the purposes of s 18 of the Competition Act 1998 (assisting Tristan Jones)
Group action by consumer who purchased or leased vehicles manufactured by VW, Audi, Škoda and SEAT which contained "defeat devices" to reduce NOx emissions during engine testing (assisting Thomas de la Mare QC and Ben Jaffey QC)
Successfully defended Camelot UK Ltd (the administrator of the National Lottery) in a claim for judicial review.
Assisting on potential claims against the Secretary of State for Health in respect of the conduct of the Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Agency.
Natasha has a busy competition law practice which includes follow-on and standalone claims in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Competition Appeals Tribunal, as well as advisory work.
Acting for one of the claimants in Second Wave of the Trucks litigation. Led by Jessica Boyd KC.
Acting for one of the defendant banks in this CPO claim in relation to foreign exchange trading. Led by Daniel Beard KC and Sarah Ford KC.
Acting for Google (led by Meredith Pickford KC) in its response to two applications for opt-out collective proceedings orders in relation to ad tech.
Instructed as junior counsel for Ofgem (led by Daniel Beard KC) in an appeal to the Competition and Markets Authority brought by Northern Powergrid against Ofgem's RIIO-ED2 price control decision.
Acting for the BBC as Interested Party in a judicial review challenge to the BBC’s launch of Radio 1 Dance (an online stream of dance music available via the BBC Sounds app) (led by Monica Carss-Frisk KC).
Acting for the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority as the Interested Party in a challenge to the CMA's decision in the Energy Licence Modification Appeals (with Daniel Cashman). Decision under appeal.
Acting for JPMorgan Chase in a damages claim against a number of global banks arising out of alleged breach of competition law concerning conduct in the FX markets (led by Daniel Beard KC).
Acted for GEMA in the Energy Licence Modification Appeals before the CMA, led by Gerry Facenna KC.
Acting for JPMorgan Chase in proposed collective proceedings before the Competition Appeal Tribunal arising out of European Commission decisions concerning conduct in FX markets (led by Sarah Ford KC).
Advising a regulatory body on competition law constraints upon its commercial activities (led by Jessica Boyd KC).
Advising on and acting in an application for an opt-out collective proceedings order in the Competition Appeals Tribunal in a high value and complex claim.
Competition Appeal Tribunal trial concerning BT's challenge to Ofcom's business connectivity market review (assisting Tristan Jones, Mark Vinall and Daniel Cashman).
Follow-on damages claim by purchasers of automobile bearings after the European Commission imposed a €953 million fine in respect of a 7-year cartel (assisting Thomas de la Mare QC, Naina Patel, Tristan Jones and Celia Rooney)
Trial of preliminary issue as to whether a railway training accreditation body is an "undertaking" for the purposes of s 18 of the Competition Act 1998 (assisting Tristan Jones)
Competition damages claim relating to the setting of interchange fees, including applicable law and limitation issues (assisting Kieron Beal QC and Tristan Jones)
Natasha accepts instructions in all areas of Chambers' civil liberties and human rights practice. She has appeared in a number of high profile judicial reviews for both claimants and respondents. She has worked on cases concerning human rights and civil liberties in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European Court of Human Rights.
Natasha has published widely on human rights and civil liberties, and taught human rights law at undergraduate and graduate levels at the University of Oxford from 2012-2016.
Natasha is a member of the Attorney General’s C Panel of Counsel.
A group of Tamil migrants who have been stranded on Diego Garcia in the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”) for three years will be admitted to the UK, it has been announced. This follows extensive litigation in the Administrative Court in London and well as the BIOT Supreme Court and Court of Appeal. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
Successfully defended the decision to grant limited bail to migrants on the British island of Diego Garcia in the British Indian Ocean Territory Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal expressed its concern about the welfare of all the migrants on the island, and particularly the children. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
The Court of Appeal of the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”) handed down its first judgment in more than 40 years. The case concerns a number of Tamil asylum seekers who have been the island of Diego Garcia in the BIOT since September 2021. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
The Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”) handed down judgment in relation to a claim for judicial review and applications for wardship brought on behalf of a number of Tamil asylum-seekers who have been stranded on the island of Diego Garcia in the BIOT for some 2.5 years. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
The Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”) handed down judgment in VT, CT & Ors v Commissioner for the BIOT (BIOT SC/No.3/2023). This was an application for judicial review of the Defendant’s refusal to determine claims for legal aid on behalf of ten impecunious asylum seekers who have been held on the island of Diego Garcia since October 2021. The Supreme Court held that the statutory and common law rights to legal aid in English law also apply in BIOT, contrary to the submissions of the Commissioner. Led by Ben Jaffey KC.
The High Court (Whipple LJ and Chamberlain J) declined to grant interim relief to the Applicants, five ethnic Tamil asylum seekers. The Applicants had previously resided in refugee camps in India, from where they set out by boat in September 2021, before being rescued by the Royal Navy and taken to the island of Diego Garcia in the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”).
Acted for the claimant NGO in a judicial review challenge to the failure to investigate allegations of Russian interference in UK democratic elections.
Acting for a group of MPs in a challenge in the ECtHR concerning the obligation to investigate hostile state interference in UK democratic elections (with Richard Hermer KC, Ben Jaffey KC and Jason Pobjoy).
Acted for the Claimant in an application for judicial review of the introduction of voter identification requirements in local government elections (led by Anthony Peto KC in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, and by Michael Fordham KC, as he then was, at first instance).
Acted for Liberty (as intervener) in a case about the proper approach, in the context of a commercial dispute, to evidence which may have been obtained by torture (with Ben Jaffey QC and George Molyneaux).
Acting pro bono on behalf of Ukraine in an inter-state case before the ECtHR concerning the Ukrainian Government's allegations of "human rights violations committed by the Russian Federation in its military operations on the territory of Ukraine since 24 February 2022"
Acting for the Claimants in this judicial review challenge to the Prime Minister’s decision not to order an independent judge-led inquiry into UK complicity in torture and rendition (led by Ben Jaffey QC). Judgment was handed down by the Divisional Court on a preliminary issue (the appropriate standard of disclosure in closed material proceedings concerning national security) and an application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal is outstanding. The substantive hearing is listed in January 2020.
Delivering training in Lebanon to two Lebanese Bar Associations on international and domestic law standards prohibiting torture and the role of human rights lawyers in upholding those standards (with Timothy Otty QC and Isabel Buchanan)
Natasha is instructed (led by Ben Jaffey QC) to act for Reprieve, David Davis MP and Dan Jarvis MP in an application for judicial review of the Government's decision not to order an independent judge-led inquiry into UK complicity into torture and rendition post 9/11.
Acting pro bono for the AIRE Centre, intervening in a case about whether refugees in the UK's sovereign base areas in Cyprus have the right to enter the metropolitan UK (with Mike Fordham QC, Katie O'Byrne and Natasha Simonsen).
Challenge to the lawfulness of the Security Services' collection and retention of bulk data (assisting Thomas de la Mare QC, Ben Jaffey QC and Daniel Cashman)
Claims by Libyan/Moroccan family against MI5 and MI6 for complicity in their unlawful abduction in Thailand, rendition to Libya, detention and torture (assisting Ben Jaffey QC)
Application to the Strasbourg Court challenging the compatibility of the Metropolitan Police's retention of personal information about peaceful protestors with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (assisting Ben Jaffey QC)
Appeal by a prisoner against the dismissal of his claims under Articles 3 and 8 ECHR and for disability discrimination in relation to sanitation arrangements in a high-security prison (assisting Ben Jaffey QC)
Natasha has considerable experience advising on issues relating to data protection, freedom of information and privacy.
Acting for the Judicial Appointments Commission (instructed by the Government Legal Department) in relation to an application for information concerning competitions for judicial appointment.
Acting for HM Treasuring (instructed by the Government Legal Department) in relation to an application for information concerning relocation of a multinational corporation’s headquarters to the UK.
Acting for the First Defendant, ENRC in a high-profile claim brought by a partner of Dechert LLP. The claim concerns alleged surveillance carried out by the Second Defendant, Diligence International as part of an investigation into alleged wrongdoing by the partner during the period in which he was retained by ENRC.
Acted for the First Defendant, ENRC in a high-profile claim brought by a partner of Dechert LLP. The claim concerned alleged surveillance carried out by the Second Defendant, Diligence International as part of an investigation into alleged wrongdoing by the partner during the period in which he was retained by ENRC (with Tom de la Mare KC and Daniel Burgess)
Advising techUK and some of its member entities on data protection obligations and the legal gateways to data sharing, including in relation to the Data Protection Acts and the GDPR
Advising a professional players’ sporting association on the implications of the GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 for athletes’ rights, including in relation to “wearables” generating personal data during sporting competitions.
Natasha has significant experience in the field of energy regulation. Since spending 3 months on secondment to Ofgem in 2018, Natasha has been involved in many of the leading cases in the area. These include challenges in the CMA to the RIIO GD2, T2 and ED2 price controls, in which she successfully represented Ofgem, an ongoing challenge by way of judicial review to the CMA's decision in relation to the RIIO2 control, and enforcement proceedings against energy suppliers in respect of smart metering obligations.
Natasha frequently advises Ofgem and regulated companies on various aspects of the UK energy regulatory scheme.
“A junior with considerable experience in energy regulation matters. Her advocacy style is measured.”
Legal 500, 2025
Instructed as junior counsel for Ofgem (led by Daniel Beard KC) in an appeal to the Competition and Markets Authority brought by Northern Powergrid against Ofgem's RIIO-ED2 price control decision.
Acting for the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority as the Interested Party in a challenge to the CMA's decision in the Energy Licence Modification Appeals (with Daniel Cashman). Decision under appeal.
Acted for GEMA in the Energy Licence Modification Appeals before the CMA, led by Gerry Facenna KC.
Natasha accepts instructions in all areas of commercial litigation. She has acted in a wide range of complex and high-value commercial disputes. She has particular expertise in commercial claims with a regulatory and/or administrative law angle.
Acting for JPMorgan Chase in proposed collective proceedings before the Competition Appeal Tribunal arising out of European Commission decisions concerning conduct in FX markets (led by Sarah Ford KC).
Acting for the First Defendant, ENRC in a high-profile claim brought by a partner of Dechert LLP. The claim concerns alleged surveillance carried out by the Second Defendant, Diligence International as part of an investigation into alleged wrongdoing by the partner during the period in which he was retained by ENRC.
Acted for the First Defendant, ENRC in a high-profile claim brought by a partner of Dechert LLP. The claim concerned alleged surveillance carried out by the Second Defendant, Diligence International as part of an investigation into alleged wrongdoing by the partner during the period in which he was retained by ENRC (with Tom de la Mare KC and Daniel Burgess)
Acting for JPMorgan Chase in a damages claim against a number of global banks arising out of alleged breach of competition law concerning conduct in the FX markets (led by Daniel Beard KC).
Natasha acted for the Defendant in this high value claim relating to alleged bribery of a foreign public official. Parallel investigation by the Serious Fraud Office. Natasha was led by Tony Peto QC and Peter Head.
Hearing in the Court of Appeal on the proper construction of pre-emption provisions in the articles of association of a private limited company (assisting Mark Vinall)
Group action by consumer who purchased or leased vehicles manufactured by VW, Audi, Škoda and SEAT which contained "defeat devices" to reduce NOx emissions during engine testing (assisting Thomas de la Mare QC and Ben Jaffey QC)
Claim concerning subordinated loans alleged to have been extinguished by operation of Russian law (assisting Andrew Green QC and Robert Weekes)
Arbitration hearing before the British Boxing Board of Control, raising issues relating to breach of contract and quantum of damages (assisting Robert Weekes).
$800m+ claim in the BVI Commercial Court concerning a joint venture in relation to various power generation and distribution assets in Russia (assisting Pushpinder Saini QC and Robert Weekes)
Claim for deceit and breach of warranty relating to a sale and purchase of a pharmaceutical company (assisting Robert Weekes)
Acted for the Defendant in a jurisdiction dispute on the applicability of the recast Brussels Regulation to flight compensation claims pursuant to EC Regulation 261/2004
Natasha's sports law practise encompasses contract law, disciplinary matters, employment, tort law, data protection and competition claims.
“Natasha is clever, straightforward, persuasive, and a pleasure to deal with. Judges trust her and she has the advocate's skill of making everything she says appear obvious and impossible to rebut.”
Legal 500, 2025
“Natasha is always calm, sensible, and clear even when passions are high or problems are emerging. She is a world-class advocate.”
Legal 500, 2024
“Working with Natasha is a pleasure; she is efficient, quick and well-prepared.”
Legal 500, 2022
An independent Panel of the IAAF Ethics Board partially upheld charges against the President of the UAE Athletics Federation and former World Athletics (previously IAAF) Council member, Ahmad Al Kamali. The Panel imposed a sanction upon Mr Al Kamali of a ban from the sport for 6 months, fined him €5,000 and ordered him to pay €15,000 in costs. Natasha acted as Legal Secretary to the Panel of the IAAF Ethics Board.
Advising a professional players’ sporting association on the implications of the GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 for athletes’ rights, including in relation to “wearables” generating personal data during sporting competitions.
Arbitration hearing before the British Boxing Board of Control, raising issues relating to breach of contract and quantum of damages (assisting Robert Weekes).
Natasha serves as one of three Legal Secretaries to the Ethics Board of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF).
Natasha has a strong academic background in public international law. Since joining Chambers, she has worked on public international law issues in cases before the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights.
Natasha's doctoral thesis at the University of Oxford was on the definition of torture in public international law. She has worked as a consultant on public international law issues including the rights of the child, refugee law, and international humanitarian law.
Acting for a group of MPs in a challenge in the ECtHR concerning the obligation to investigate hostile state interference in UK democratic elections (with Richard Hermer KC, Ben Jaffey KC and Jason Pobjoy).
Advising an international corporation working in responsible sourcing of natural resources on the legal effect of Security Council Resolutions (including e.g. in relation to conflict diamonds)
Acting pro bono on behalf of Ukraine in an inter-state case before the ECtHR concerning the Ukrainian Government's allegations of "human rights violations committed by the Russian Federation in its military operations on the territory of Ukraine since 24 February 2022"
Delivering training in Lebanon to two Lebanese Bar Associations on international and domestic law standards prohibiting torture and the role of human rights lawyers in upholding those standards (with Timothy Otty QC and Isabel Buchanan)
Acting pro bono for the AIRE Centre, intervening in a case about whether refugees in the UK's sovereign base areas in Cyprus have the right to enter the metropolitan UK (with Mike Fordham QC, Katie O'Byrne and Natasha Simonsen).
Natasha is instructed (led by Ben Jaffey QC) to act for Reprieve, David Davis MP and Dan Jarvis MP in an application for judicial review of the Government's decision not to order an independent judge-led inquiry into UK complicity into torture and rendition post 9/11.
Claims by Libyan/Moroccan family against MI5 and MI6 for complicity in their unlawful abduction in Thailand, rendition to Libya, detention and torture (assisting Ben Jaffey QC)
Natasha has worked on a number of matters with private international law aspects, including questions of jurisdiction, applicable law and limitation.
Claim concerning subordinated loans alleged to have been extinguished by operation of Russian law (assisting Andrew Green QC and Robert Weekes)
$800m+ claim in the BVI Commercial Court concerning a joint venture in relation to various power generation and distribution assets in Russia (assisting Pushpinder Saini QC and Robert Weekes)
Acted for the Defendant in a jurisdiction dispute on the applicability of the recast Brussels Regulation to flight compensation claims pursuant to EC Regulation 261/2004
Competition damages claim relating to the setting of interchange fees, including applicable law and limitation issues (assisting Kieron Beal QC and Tristan Jones)
LLB (Distinction) (University of Sydney); BCL (Distinction) (Oxon); MPhil, DPhil (Oxon)
Simonsen N ‘Torture’ in Grote R, R Wolfrum and F Lachenmann (eds) Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (OUP 2017) (forthcoming)
Lazarus L and N Simonsen ‘Judicial Review and Parliamentary Debate: Enriching the Doctrine of Due Deference', in Hunt M, H Hooper and P Yowell (eds) Redressing the Democratic Deficit on Human Rights (Hart 2015)
Simonsen N (2011) ‘“War on Terror”: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 2006 (Book Review)’ (2011) European Human Rights Law Review 239
Chilton, F, Rathmall, A & Simonsen, N (2008) ‘Mergers and Acquisitions in Australia’ in Lachman, A (ed) Mergers and Acquisitions: A Practical Global Guide, Globe Business Publishing Ltd
Natasha completed a three-month internship at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Islamabad, Pakistan in 2008. She has also volunteered for refugee and homelessness charities in Australia and the UK, and in 2012 she and and a group of friends swam the English Channel to raise money for the Acid Survivors Foundation Pakistan.
VAT registration number: 276276275
Barristers regulated by the Bar Standards Board
Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Derek Sutton
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7327
Adam Sloane
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7326
Dean Tolman
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7331
Billy Brian
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7339
Marc Armstrong
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7330
Adam Fuschillo
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7329
Danny Compton
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7338
Sophie Reeve
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7324
Toby Dennison
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7328
Daniel Higgins
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7322
Lilly-Grace Hilliard
Clerk
+44 (0)20 7822 7234