Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Harish Salve KC is one of the world’s leading arbitration counsel.
He is a very experienced and senior lawyer with a global reputation for international commercial arbitration and litigation. His practice also encompasses public international law, human rights, civil fraud, public, energy and tax.
Harish is admitted to the Bar in England & Wales and was appointed a King’s Counsel in 2020.
Harish was formerly Solicitor General of India and is a Senior Advocate at the Indian Bar (1992), practicing largely in the Supreme Court of India. In 2015, it was announced that Harish had been awarded one of India’s highest accolades, the Padma Bhushan.
Harish is one of the world’s leading international arbitration counsel.
Harish has arbitrated commercial cases under ICC, LCIA, SIAC and UNCITRAL rules and has a particular expertise in the area of Bilateral Investment Treaty Arbitrations.
He has been appointed by the ICC and the LCIA as an arbitrator in arbitrations in London, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur and Delhi. He is an SIAC panel member.
“Harish Salve is very effective.”
Chambers and Partners, 2025
“A huge intellect, he can make the difference in a difficult case.”
Legal 500, 2022
“A very senior counsel who has a foothold in London.”
Chambers and Partners, 2021
“A very experienced international practitioner.”
Chambers and Partners, 2020
“Hugely experienced in India-related arbitrations.”
Legal 500, 2019
“He has managed to establish a giant reputation in international arbitration.”
Chambers and Partners, 2019
“A leading player for the largest India-related disputes.”
Legal 500, 2018
“A giant reputation in international arbitration”
Chambers and Partners, 2018
Successfully represented
Vodafone BV in a Bilateral Investment Treaty arbitration against India over
whether the phone company should have withheld $2.2bn in capital gains taxes. The
Tribunal consisted of Sir Franklin Berman, Hon’ble Yves Fortier and Dr. Rodrigo
Oreamuno.
Acted for ArcelorMittal USA in
a claim for enforcement of foreign arbitral award worth in excess of US$1bn
involving applications for search, freezing and information orders in England
and various foreign jurisdictions, including Cayman Islands, Mauritius, USA and
India, in dispute between two multi-national companies.
Represented Vedanta, a
UK listed company, in a Bilateral Investment Treaty arbitration against India.
The Tribunal panel consisted Mr. Michael Hwang, Mr. James Spigelman and Mr.
Donald McRae.
Represented the IMFA in an
investment treaty claim against
Indonesia under the India-Indonesia Bilateral Investment Treaty arising out of
a failed coal mining project, which lead to a breach of the India-Indonesia
BIT.
Represented Reliance
Industries Ltd (RIL) in a $1.7 billion UNCITRAL dispute against the Indian
Government.
Represented RAKIA in a BIT claim against India arising out of a failed
MoU between the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh (A.P.) and RAKIA for bauxite
supply, which was allegedly cancelled due to the concerns of the tribal people
of that area. The cancellation of the project was alleged to be a breach of the
Indian-UAE BIT. The Tribunal comprised of L. Hoffmann, J.W. Rowley and C.K.
Prasad.
Acted for McDonalds in an LCIA arbitration valued at
$100m. The dispute is between McDonalds and subsidiary and an Indian franchise.
Acting for a well-known industrialist in a $125m+ dispute relating to an investment in India alleging various breaches of warranty.
A UNCITRAL arbitration dispute related to retrospective tax measures adopted by the Indian Government with over $5.5 billion at stake.
Acted in a
$1bn ICC arbitration dispute over a put option in a share purchase agreement.
Represented Malaysian and Mauritian investors (in the
DTH and Radio Sector) in an arbitration arising out of a BIT claim against
India.
Acted in an arbitration between an Indian company
established by American Shareholders and a Government of India company.
Appeared in the Supreme Court
in the case relating to the jurisdiction of Indian courts in relation to
international arbitrations.
Harish has a broad and distinguished Public International Law practice representing clients including States and multi-national companies.
Appeared for the President of India and the Union of India in a £35 million partition era dispute between India, Pakistan and successors in title to 7th Nizam of Hyderabad.
Acted as lead Counsel for the Union of India before the
International Court of Justice which held the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to
be in breach of its obligations under the Vienna Convention on Consular
Relations, 1963 in failing to provide consular access to an Indian national
sentenced to death by a military court in Pakistan. (Judgment dated 17 July
2019)
Appeared for the Union of
India in the Supreme Court relating to the sharing of Cauvery waters.
Represented India before the International Court of
Justice (ICJ) in proceedings instituted by the Republic of Marshall Islands
(RMI) against nine States, including India and UK, with respect to nuclear
disarmament. The ICJ held public hearings in March 2016 on the question of its
jurisdiction and upheld India’s objection to jurisdiction based on the absence
of a dispute between the parties.
Appeared for the State of
Kerala in a dispute relating to the Mulliperiyar Dam.
Appeared for the Italian
Government in the Supreme Court of India in the case relating to the Italian
Marines.
Appeared for the State of
Gujarat in the dispute relating to the Sardar Sarovar Dam.
Harish has a world-class commercial law practice. His expertise in the courts of both England and Wales and India gives him unrivalled experience as lead counsel representing multi-national corporations in multi-jurisdictional litigation.
Represented Reliance Industries before the Securities Appellate Tribunal
against an order passed by SEBI banning Reliance and its promoter companies
from trading in equity derivatives based on allegations of market manipulation
strategies undertaken by Reliance amounting to unfair trade practice. (Judgment
awaited)
Lead Counsel for ArcelorMittal
before the Supreme Court of India which upheld the Resolution Plan submitted by
ArcelorMittal to buy out the insolvent Essar Steel India Limited under the
provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Acted for ArcelorMittal USA in
a claim for enforcement of foreign arbitral award worth in excess of US$1bn
involving applications for search, freezing and information orders in England
and various foreign jurisdictions, including Cayman Islands, Mauritius, USA and
India, in dispute between two multi-national companies.
Represented Vodafone
before the Delhi High Court in an anti-arbitration suit brought by the Union of
India against arbitration proceedings initiated by Vodafone under the Bilateral
Investment Treaty between UK and India.
The Single judge held in favour of Vodafone in May 2018.
Appeared in the Supreme Court
of India for the Telecom Cases relating to 2G licences.
Represented Tata Sons against a claim brought by a minority shareholder under allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The case involved complex issues concerning corporate governance. The National Companies Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held in favour of the claimant but the Supreme Court of India has stayed this judgment.
General Experience
India Practice
Amicus Curiae Briefs
VAT registration number: 195378460
Barristers regulated by the Bar Standards Board
Gary Oliver
Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7325
Derek Sutton
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7327
Adam Sloane
Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7326
Dean Tolman
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7331
Billy Brian
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7339
Marc Armstrong
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7330
Adam Fuschillo
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7329
Danny Compton
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7338
Sophie Reeve
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7324
Toby Dennison
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7328
Daniel Higgins
Clerk
+44 (0) 207 822 7322
Lilly-Grace Hilliard
Clerk
+44 (0)20 7822 7234